Home Blog Posts Genderless Jesus Class at BYU-Sad!

Genderless Jesus Class at BYU-Sad!

2109
This BYU Class of a Professors slide is shocking

Religion of Academia, Gender Dysfunction, Drag Queens, Intellectuals, Furry Litter Boxes in Schools for children who think they are a Cat, and now a “Genderless Jesus?” It’s sick and wrong. It’s hard to even imagine this type of filth in our world being taught to our children. What is more shocking to me, it is being taught at BYU along with the radical and in my opinion evil doctrine of Critical Race Theory.( CRT)

Don’t Fear, Have Faith

Students Who Blew Whistle On BYU ‘Revealing Whiteness’ Assignment Threatened With Discipline

Surprise! Utah is a hotbed of CRT activism and mandates in higher education.

A professor at Brigham Young University (BYU), in Provo, Utah, recently assigned a Revealing Whiteness assignment to a 100-level Sociology course. The resulting controversy has pitted conservative students against activist academic staff. One professor has threatened the students that posted the lesson to social media with severe punishment under BYU’s student conduct rules.

While this type of controversy over wokeness in reliably red Utah may come as a surprise to some, the state’s higher education system has begun to mandate lessons based in Critical Race Theory (CRT) for all colleges and universities operating in the state.

Campus Reform first reported on the controversial lesson:

A professor at Brigham Young University (BYU) allegedly assigned a classroom exercise titled “Revealing Whiteness Activity.”

Professor Jane Lopez assigned the activity as homework and instructed students to photograph three representations of “Whiteness” on campus.” Source

See more on CRT at my blog here:

What Prophets and Leadesr Say

“I do not know all of the providences of the Lord, but I do know that he permits false doctrine to be taught in and out of the Church and that such teaching is part of the sifting process of mortality.” Bruce R. McConkie, McConkie’s 1981 letter to BYU

President J. Reuben Clark famously said, “If we have the truth, it cannot be harmed by investigation. If we have not the truth, it ought to be harmed.”

The cornerstone of “sound scholarship” in our day is the comfortable doctrine that the answer no can never be quite as wrong as the answer yes, a proposition which to my knowledge has never been demonstrated. Excuse me if I seem recalcitrant, but I find it odd that the one skill most appreciated and rewarded in those circles where one hears everlastingly of “the inquiring mind” and the importance of “finding out for one’s self” is the gift and power of taking things for granted. Even our Latter-day Saint intellectuals are convinced that the way to impress the Gentiles is not to acquire a mastery of their critical tools, (how few even know Latin!), but simply to defer in all things to their opinions.The WORLD Of The JAREDITES Improvement Era 1951-52 PART II The Tower By Hugh Nibley

“It’s narrative is a chronicle of nations long since gone. But in its descriptions of the problems of today’s society, it is as current as the morning newspaper and much more definitive, inspired, and inspiring concerning the solutions to those problems… If the Book of Mormon is true, then America is a choice land, but if it is to remain such the inhabitants of the land must worship the God of the land, the Lord Jesus Christ. The histories of two great nations, told with warning in this sacred volume, indicate that while we must have science, while we must have education, while we must have arms, we also must have righteousness if we are to merit the protection of God.” Gordon B. Hinckley The Power of the Book of Mormon Ensign June 1988

Professors Bias and Historians Opinions

Just as there is bias in all of us, we must also be aware that Professors at our Universities, and some Church Historians and Intellectuals can also share their bias as well. Here is an example from the Church book series titles, “Saints.”

First I want to say the Saints Book is very good to read and I like it. The Church has worked hard to put together a great volume to help others understand the history of the church in a narrative way. There are in the church historians and intellectuals who like to retell history or revise things you may want to be aware of. The Prophet and the 12 have trusted these people to say the correct things and most of the time they do what is right. However, some of these intellects who think they are more important that the Brethren they serve, make mistakes. Some items are mistakes, but I feel much of it is their pride to look good or unique or more informed than others. For example:

“SAINTS”

“When the book Saints was published, I noted that the term Cumorah had been censored from the text. I attributed this censorship to an effort by Church historians to revise Church history to accommodate their M2C* colleagues.

Recently the editors publicly acknowledged the censorship of Cumorah. In this post we’ll examine their statement.

Many readers prefer short posts, so here are three twitter-length summaries:

1. Saints creates a false narrative present; i.e., characters in the book do not have 1827-1844 ideas about the New York Cumorah that is well established in original sources. 

2. Instead, the characters in Saints know nothing about Cumorah, a reflection of the late 20th century “two Cumorahs” theory created by M2C intellectuals.

3. In responses to criticism, the editors of Saints published an essay that seeks to explain their censorship of Cumorah with a series of inconsistent and counterfactual justifications.

4. The editors of Saints ultimately admit they censored the term Cumorah to “uphold” so-called “neutrality,” a euphemism for accommodating the M2C theory of Book of Mormon geography.

Over a year ago I anticipated this outcome in Saints, which is part of a well-established a pattern by LDS intellectuals to erase the New York Cumorah from the historical record and from the knowledge of members of the Church.**

There is additional related revisionist editing in Saints, such as replacing  terms from original sources (“this continent” and “this country”) with the M2C-approved term “the Americas.” Another problem is the phony 20th century story about Mary Whitmer being shown the plates by Moroni.

For thousands of members of the Church, the censorship of Cumorah has become a serious enough issue that the editors of Saints responded publicly (although they haven’t yet responded  to the other revisionist problems in Saints). Jonathan Neville. More Here!

*M2C means Mesoamerica 2 Hill Cumorah’s Theory


A brave young lady speaks out about a BYU class titled “The Genderless Jesus” on the video below. I am appalled and angry at so much evil and wrong doctrine is being taught, not only at BYU but all over the world.

Androgyny

noun

  1. The state of being androgynous; union of sexes in one individual; hermaphroditism.
  2. Union of both sexes in one individual; hermaphroditism.
  3. hermaphroditism

 

 

 

 This ′Old Devil’s Letter to the Young’? by CS Lewis

C. S. Lewis wrote this nearly 70 years ago but could have been written today:

“One young devil asked the old man: “How did you manage to bring so many souls to hell?” The old devil answered: “I instilled fear in them!”

Answers the youngster: “Great job! And what were they afraid of? Wars? Hunger?”

Answers the man: “No, they were afraid of the disease!”

For this youngster: “Does this mean they didn’t get sick? Are they not dead? There was no rescue for them?”

The old man answered: “But no … they got sick, died, and the rescue was there.”

The young devil, surprised, answered: “Then I don’t understand?”

The old man answered: “You know they believed the only thing they have to keep at any cost is their lives. They stopped hugging, greeting each other. They’ve moved away from each other. They gave up all social contacts and everything that was human! Later they ran out of money, lost their jobs, but that was their choice because they were afraid for their lives, that’s why they quit their jobs without even having bread.

“They believed blindly everything they heard and read in the papers. They gave up their freedoms, they didn’t leave their own homes literally anywhere. They stopped visiting family and friends. The world turned into such a concentration camp, without forcing them into captivity. They accepted everything! Just to live at least one more miserable day … And so living, they died every day! And that’s how it was very easy for me to take their miserable souls to hell …” CS Lewis

This is the World Today, without Question. Let’s Wake-Up Friends!

Save our Children

If we as a world and a Country, and as members of the true Church don’t wake up, our miserable souls will also be in hell. I don’t believe the Lord creates anyone except wonderful Children of God. If so, how do we become so complacent and lulled to sleep? How does Satan lead us? Carefully, and with carnal security.

Our current government of the United States and most countries of the world have been infiltrated with Satan and his Cabal or Deep State for many years. Can’t you see that? This is the last days remeber. Satan is more evil than ever. Just because all looks fine in your neighborhood, it isn’t. Satan hides and over and overwhelms us with propaganda, and telling us to eat drink and be merry. Can’t we see his ploy? Wake up. Do you realize over 5-8 million children and youth go missing in the world every year? Ask Tim Ballard. Where are they? What happened to them? Most are in deep dark literal dungeons under the earth called DUMBS. (Look it up. ) I will let you imagine what Baal and Moloch and Satan do. The same thing they did in the scriptures below.

“9 When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations.

10 There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,

11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.

12 For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.” Deut. 18:9-12

My good friend, Sam Dunaway shared an appropriate scripture with me from Malachi 12:17Ye have wearied the Lord with your words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and he delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment?”


GenderBread Person

REPORT: BYU ‘Human Development’ Course Features the ‘Genderbread Person,’ Says Jesus Was ‘Not Masculine’

(AP Photo/Eric Risberg)
College, one might say, has changed. Whereas secondary schools once served as sophisticated training grounds, they appear to have transformed into more elementary institutions.

Case in point: Young adults in Utah are learning about themselves by way of a mythical cookie.

Allegedly, that is.

On Facebook recently, Natalie Cline — a Utah State Board of Education member and congregant of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS) — posted a photo from a course at Church-affiliated Brigham Young University.

Her caption:

(A) student texted [this] picture to her mom during her Human Development class at BYU Provo just THIS MORNING…

Natalie linked to what she explained was the lecture’s full slide deck as well as a three-minute audio clip.

The photo accompanying her post revealed a projected image in a large university classroom. Its focus: a drawing of “The Gingerbread Person,” alternately known as The Genderbread Person.

As seen in the image, terms are tied by arrows to the confected creature. The word “Sex” points to Mr./Ms. Cookie’s crotch; “Expression” outlines his/her body; “Identity” fills the progressive pastry’s rainbow-colored brain; and “Orientation is in the baked being’s heart.

To the right of the woke wafer are in-depth descriptions:

Gender Identity — ranges from Woman to Genderqueer to Man.
Gender identity is how you, in your head, think about yourself. It’s the chemistry that composes you (e.g., hormonal levels) and how you interpret what that means.

Gender Expression — ranges from Feminine to Androgynous to Masculine.
Gender expression is how you demonstrate your gender (based on traditional gender roles) through the ways you act, dress, behave, and interact.

Biological Sex — ranges from Female to Intersex to Male.
Biological sex refers to the objectively measurable organs, hormones, and chromosomes. Female = vagina, ovaries, XX chromosomes; male = penis, testes, XY chromosomes; intersex = a combination of the two.

Sexual Orientation — ranges from Heterosexual to Bisexual to Homosexual.
Sexual orientation is who you are physically, spiritually, and emotionally attracted to, based on their sex/gender in relation to your own.

It seems to me the above is a bit half-baked. If gender identity is defined by both “the chemistry that composes you” and “how you interpret what that means,” then your chemical composition plays no part; how you interpret things is the sole defining component. And the area directly linking “woman” to “man” leaves out lots of interpretive possibilities. Furthermore, if sexual orientation is based on one’s identity relative to the identity of others — which can be anything any person interprets it to be — then sexual orientation cannot simply exist linearly between heterosexual and homosexual.

After all:

Not to mention:

BYU seems a smidge behind the times. Maybe they should bake a better cookie.

Meanwhile, the professor evidently believes he or she has had a religious revelation. Back to Natalie’s post:

(The) student texted…this key takeaway from the teacher: “Not masculine, not feminine, Christlike. Androgyny is the key.”

This is blasphemous and goes completely against gospel doctrine. These teachings are not endorsed by the Church or BYU, but by wolves in sheep’s clothing that wish to devour the flock.

It may go against LDS doctrine, but it’s right in sync with modern cultural theology. And given that, the course name is correct: It’s all part and parcel of humanity’s new phase of development.” -ALEX

Furry Litter Box

A SCHOOL in Michigan has bizarrely been accused by outraged parents of installing litter boxes in bathrooms for students who identify as cats and dogs.

Midland Public Schools Superintendent Michael E. Sharrow took to Facebook on Thursday to deny the claims, insisting no litter box accommodations had been made for any students who identify as a “furry.”

The bizarre rumor pertains to a school in Michigan's Midland Public Schools District

The bizarre rumor pertains to a school in Michigan’s Midland Public Schools District Credit: Google Maps

Parents have claimed that at least one litter box was installed in a unisex bathroom for children who identify themselves as 'furries'

Parents have claimed that at least one litter box was installed in a unisex bathroom for children who identify themselves as ‘furries’ Credit: Getty

A “furry” is someone who role-plays or identifies as an animal, or an animal character with human-like characteristics. Some furries even wear animal costumes or tails in public.

In his statement, Sharrow said it was “unconscionable that this afternoon I am sending this communication.

“However, our Midland PS stakeholders may be confused about a false message/accusation that has resurfaced this week and is gaining traction in the social media realm.”

Sharrow said the rumor was recently brought up by a parent during a school board meeting on December 20 and has since been shared widely online.

“Let me be clear in this communication. There is no truth whatsoever to this false statement/accusation! There have never been litter boxes within MPS schools.

“It is a source of disappointment that I felt the necessity to communicate this message to you.”

I was also told at least 8 schools in Salt lake County, currently have litter boxes in both the boys and girls bathrooms. It’s sick and wrong!


Brainwashed School Kids Now Identifying as Animal “Furries”

Source:  Alex Newman

As if identifying as newly invented “genders” was not outlandish enough, indoctrinated and confused victims of government schools are now coming to class wearing tails, fake animal ears and even leashes. They call themselves “furries.” And estimates suggest there are already hundreds of thousands across America.

The Newman Report has received communications about this disturbing trend from parents across multiple states including Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, and more. Video of children barking like dogs or meowing like cats while scooting around on all fours have become increasingly popular on social media, too.

Even the “mainstream” media has started picking up on the phenomena in government schools — even in conservative states. NBC affiliate WLWT, for instance, recently reported on concerns among parents in the Meade County, Kentucky, School District about children “attending school acting like and dressing as cats.”

One grandmother of two in the local high-school was too scared to give her name but wanted to speak out nonetheless. “Apparently, from what I understand, they’re called ‘furries,’” the grandmother told WLKY. “They identify with animals. These people will hiss at you or scratch at you if they don’t like something you’re doing.”

According to the grandmother quoted by the NBC affiliate, she first became aware of the bizarre fetish spreading among school children in 2020. “But it really got bad when they went back to school this year,” she explained. “I have two grandkids in school and my grandkids didn’t want to go to school anymore.”

Students have even started a petition seeking to stop the practice, warning that some of these confused children were even biting fellow students as if they were wild animals with the knowledge of school officials.

Meanwhile, one woman who did not identify herself took to social media to explain that she was fired as a substitute teacher for refusing to “meow” back to a self-proclaimed “furry” child in the class she was subbing for. Apparently refusing to play along with the kitty delusion is tantamount to “misgendering” a student confused about their gender.

Biden signs bill to codify gay ‘marriage’ with an activist drag queen in attendance

The president claimed the controversial legislation will ‘strike a blow against hate in all its forms.’

Posted BY: Teresa | NwoReport

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — President Joe Biden signed the so-called Respect for Marriage Act into law Tuesday at a White House ceremony filled with guests that included a “queer youth” activist drag queen.

The RMA repeals the longstanding (but unenforced) Defense of Marriage Act (which recognized marriage as a man-woman union in federal law and protected states’ rights to do the same), federally recognizes any “marriage” lawfully performed by any state and forces every state to recognize any “marriage” of any other state “between two individuals,” without regard for “the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.”

Tensions have swirled over the bill since July when 47 Republicans joined Democrats to pass the first version out of the U.S. House of Representatives. But while opposition from conservative groups, religious leaders, and Republican voters led supporters to offer amendments meant primarily to satisfy religious liberty concerns (inadequately, according to conservatives), the Senate voted to pass the amended version, with 12 Republicans joining Democrats. The House voted last week to pass the final version, with 39 Republicans joining Democrats.

https://nworeport.me/2022/12/14/biden-signs-bill-to-codify-gay-marriage-with-an-activist-drag-queen-in-attendance/

Here is a list of Utah Congressmen who voted for this bill:

How did Utah’s GOP congressmen vote on a bill to write same-sex marriage into law?

Rep. Burgess Owens, left, Rep. Blake Moore, Rep. Chris Stewart, all Utah Republicans, pose for photos.
Rep. Burgess Owens, left, Rep. Blake Moore and Rep. Chris Stewart, all Utah Republicans, pose for photos at the Awaken Event Center in South Jordan after each won their primary race on Tuesday, June 28, 2022. Spenser Heaps, Deseret News

Utah’s four Republican congressmen joined all House Democrats in passing a bill Tuesday that would write same-sex marriage into law.

In all, 47 GOP House members crossed party lines in the bipartisan 267-157 vote for the Respect for Marriage Act.

Rep. John Curtis, R-Utah, said the majority opinion of the Supreme Court clearly stated that the court has no intention of reversing any decisions respecting the right to marriage in the Constitution.

“That said, I also understand how important codifying these protections are to many Utahans. I do not believe the federal government should infringe upon an individual’s decision about who they wish to marry,” he said in a statement.” Source

In a stunning move, LDS Church comes out for bill that recognizes same-sex marriage

Church doctrine still supports only man-woman marriage, but scholar says the news reflects a “dramatic reversal of previous teachings.”

(Rick Bowmer | AP) A couple look at the Salt Lake Temple, April 6, 2019. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints voiced its support for the federal Respect for Marriage Act, which recognizes legally sanctioned same-sex marriage, as long as it safeguards religious freedoms.

(Rick Bowmer | AP) A couple look at the Salt Lake Temple, April 6, 2019. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints voiced its support for the federal Respect for Marriage Act, which recognizes legally sanctioned same-sex marriage, as long as it safeguards religious freedoms.

In an unexpected move, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints gave its support Tuesday to a proposed federal law that would codify marriages between same-sex couples.

The Utah-based faith’s doctrine “related to marriage between a man and a woman is well known and will remain unchanged,” the church stated in a news release. “We are grateful for the continuing efforts of those who work to ensure the Respect for Marriage Act includes appropriate religious freedom protections while respecting the law and preserving the rights of our LGBTQ brothers and sisters.”

The church’s remarks come after the act’s sponsors added an amendment to the House-passed bill exempting religious organizations, including faith-based universities, from providing “services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods or privileges for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage.” Neither could the act be used to alter the tax-exempt status of any organization.

Don’t Doubt The Prophet and Apostles

I am a life long member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and in good standing. This bill that our congress and our Church just agreed with in passing, is difficult to understand, but I agree with their stand of supporting this bill.

On the initial reading of this bill, it may seem the wrong thing for our true Church to do. But, as it says in Article of Faith 12, “We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.”

We must remeber this world is Satan’s world and we must be “in it but not of it.” We must be here to learn and grow. We will never progress if we don’t have opposition and learn how to stay true to the Savior while still obeying and sustaining the law of man.

Why was the Promised Land chosen by God to be here in the United States? First, before addressing that question let me share something with you.

Let’s consider another country such as Iran which has a Theocracy which means “A form of government in which God is recognized as the supreme civil ruler of the state, and his laws are taken as the statute-book of the kingdom.” Source

In other words, what ever their so-called god or Ayatollah says, is the way you are FORCED to live according to the law of one person who they call a god. Did you know that in Iran if you are gay or lesbian they will kill you? If they find out through others or by their own research, you will be killed. That sounds like Satan’s plan doesn’t it? Doesn’t freedom mean making a wrong choice or a right choice as it is up to us. 

Blessings and Curses

If our church said two gay people cannot be married, or they will be put in prison or fined or killed, would that be a righteous Prophet or Savior? No! The Church can and does say, only a man and a woman can be sealed in the Temple, and that is our right as a church or as an organization. Shouldn’t we teach correct principles and then allow others to choose for themselves? Yes! For every choice there is a blessing and a curse.

Therefore, O my son, whosoever will come may come and partake of the waters of life freely; and whosoever will not come the same is not compelled to come; but in the last day it shall be restored unto him according to his deeds.

If he has desired to do evil, and has not repented in his days, behold, evil shall be done unto him, according to the restoration of God.” Alma 42:27-28

Why the Lord Chose the United States

Back to my question of, why did God make the choice to have the United States be the Promised Land for the restoration of the gospel? The Bill of Rights says, God gives us Life, Liberty, and the right to pursue Happiness. Here is the answer to the question by Orson F; Whitney, “In culmination of the grand scheme of schemes, this great nation, the Republic of the United States, might be established upon this land as an asylum for the oppressed; a resting place, it might be said, for the Ark of the covenant, where the temple of our God might be built; where the plan of salvation might be introduced and practiced in freedom, and not a dog would wag his tongue in opposition to the purposes of the Almighty. We believe that this was His object in creating the Republic of the United States; the only land where his work could be commenced or the feet of his people find rest. No other land had such liberal institutions, had adopted so broad a platform upon which all men might stand. We give glory to those patriots for the noble work they did; but we give the first glory to God, our Father and their Father, who inspired them. We take them by the hand as brothers. We believe they did nobly their work, even as we would fain do ours, faithfully and well, that we might not be recreant in the eyes of God, for failing to perform the mission to which He has appointed us.” Bishop Orson F. Whitney, delivered in the Tabernacle, Salt Lake City, Sunday Afternoon, April 19, 1885. Reported by John Irvine. Journal Discourses Volume 26 Page 201

You see, Iran and most other countries, don’t have Liberal Institutions. They try and force all people to live only what their god or government or king or dictator tells them to. Our land of America with the Constitution that Christ wrote, (D&C 101:80), we allow others their freedom of choice and then hopefully elect good men and women to pass righteous laws to govern all people, regardless of their belief in God or not. We can’t and shouldn’t force others to follow our Church doctrine any more than the Catholics should force us to live their religion. Freedom and Liberty is why the Lord choose this land of the United States. Mesoamerica doesn’t have that, China doesn’t have that and no other land had such “liberal” or open institutions as the USA has.

To me, this explains why our Church agreed with this new bill. They must protect our religious liberties, or our church could be forced to allow gay’s to marry in the temple or other issues we don’t agree with. Sometimes you need to pass or follow a law of the government that is flawed, in order to follow a higher principle. Remeber, God will rule and reign on this cleansed earth, but that time is not here, yet! It’s close, as I feel our good government is mostly infiltrated with evil right now, but good will conquer bad. This is a fight of God vs Satan and has nothing to do with a Republican vs a Democrat.


Statement on the United States Congress Respect for Marriage Act.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints released the following statement on Tuesday, November 15, 2022.

“The doctrine of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints related to marriage between a man and a woman is well known and will remain unchanged.We are grateful for the continuing efforts of those who work to ensure the Respect for Marriage Act includes appropriate religious freedom protections while respecting the law and preserving the rights of our LGBTQ brothers and sisters.We believe this approach is the way forward. As we work together to preserve the principles and practices of religious freedom together with the rights of LGBTQ individuals, much can be accomplished to heal relationships and foster greater understanding.” The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Official-Statement-2022